# 3RD vs Nimt

Nimt pairs daily AI tracking with a credit-based agent that does the work.

Test 3RD free on your brand

Book a demo

Comparison

3RD vs Nimt: more output, or the reason behind the gap.

the reason behind the gap

Nimt pairs daily tracking with an AI agent you hand work to, paid for in credits. 3RD is built for marketing teams: it finds out why AI picks your competitors in each market and plans the work toward your goal, at a fixed price. 3RD drafts the fixes in your brand voice; your team approves and publishes.

Built by former Googlers and veterans of brands and agencies.

Quick answer · updated October 31, 2026

Nimt or 3RD: which fits your team?

Nimt gives the most tracked AI answers per euro and an agent paid in credits. 3RD diagnoses why competitors win, per market, at a fixed price. Nimt, from Helsingborg, Sweden, tracks 8 models from its entry plan and its agent produces content, PR and Reddit posts on credits. 3RD (get3rd.com) scores five drivers per market, builds a Playbook toward your goal and drafts the fixes for your team to approve.

Monitor

Ask AI models the questions your buyers ask, in every market and language you choose. Answers come through each provider's API; for ChatGPT, 3RD can also capture answers from the consumer app.

Diagnose

Score the five drivers AI uses to choose a brand (content coverage, content quality, agent readiness, authority and outreach) for every market.

Plan

Set a goal and get a Playbook: the ranked work to reach it, checked daily against the latest AI answers. Estimated impact is kept apart from measured change.

Act

3RD drafts the fixes in your brand voice; your team approves and publishes. Outreach comes as briefs for your PR team.

How 3RD works

Diagnose, plan, then draft, per market

Choose Nimt if…

You want the most tracked answers per euro, with any of 8 models on the entry plan. You want unlimited users and brands from day one. You want an agent in Slack that runs recurring jobs across your tools, including PR pitches and Reddit and social content.

Choose 3RD if…

You want to know why competitors get chosen before you produce more content. You want a five-driver diagnosis per market and a Playbook tied to a goal, checked daily. You want a fixed monthly price that includes the drafting, and a trial with no card.

Decide

Which one fits you?

3RD

Nimt

Category AI visibility platform AI search tracking plus AI agent

Based in Copenhagen, Denmark Helsingborg, Sweden (Nimtelligence AB)

Entry price €99/month (€84 billed annually) €79/month ($89) for 10,000 credits

Pricing model Fixed plans by daily AI responses, models, brands and depth; drafts are part of the plan price Credits shared by tracking and agent work; 11 public tiers from €79 to €5,999/month

Enterprise From €2,500/month, annual, public floor Custom annual contract, unlimited credits, price on request

Trial 7-day free trial, no card needed Card required; €40 ($45) in free credits

Models Up to 2 / 3 / 4 on Starter / Pro / Growth, up to 14 on Enterprise; add a model for €65/month All 8 on Flex; more models means fewer prompts per day for the same credits. 13 on Enterprise

How answers are collected Each provider's API, plus ChatGPT consumer-app capture Local proxies per market, "the way a person would" (Claude via API)

Cadence Daily on Starter, Pro and Growth; daily or rolling on Enterprise Daily

Markets Country plus language, any market from Pro 230 countries, unlimited languages, every plan

Brands 1 / up to 4 / up to 10 / every brand Unlimited projects, domains and brands

Users 2 on Starter, unlimited from Pro Unlimited

Why competitors win Five-driver diagnosis per market Citation gaps, source tracker, query fan-outs, recommended actions

Plan toward a goal Playbook checked daily (Pro and up) Agent builds a plan and recurring jobs on request

Content Drafts in your brand voice, sent to your CMS as drafts Agent writes and, with approval, publishes through connected apps

PR, Reddit and social Outreach briefs; the authority driver shows Reddit, review and Wikipedia gaps Agent drafts press releases, pitches, Reddit and LinkedIn content

AI crawler logs Vercel and Cloudflare logs Not yet offered (Nimt blog, June 3, 2026)

Prompt demand Demand score 0 to 5 per prompt Not yet offered (same source)

Data out CSV, Looker Studio, Export API from Pro, MCP for Claude and ChatGPT Data Studio on every plan, MCP read and write; API on Enterprise only

Agencies Partner pricing per client brand; Pitch mode and Assessments for prospects Unlimited clients on any plan, white-label client reports via MCP

Data and security Stored in the EU, encrypted, never used to train public AI models, GDPR DPA AWS in the EU, encryption, AI providers may not train on your content, DPA published

Side by side

3RD and Nimt, side by side

Pricing

Credits vs fixed plans

Counted in the same unit (one answer from one model to one prompt, 30-day month, every slot used): Nimt Flex at €79/month gives about 216 answers a day, about €12 per 1,000 answers, and larger tiers about €9. 3RD Starter at €99/month gives 40 a day, €82.50 per 1,000; Pro is about €100 and Growth about €55. Per tracked answer, Nimt is clearly cheaper: roughly 5 to 9 times, depending on the plans you compare. What that does not show: on Nimt, tracking and agent work share the same credits, the credit cost per task is not published, and work pauses when credits run out. On 3RD, the plan price covers tracking, the diagnosis, the Playbook (from Pro) and drafts. More tracking costs more: 50 extra daily AI responses are €100/month, and another model is €65/month.

Our data

What our data shows

More output is not the same as more visibility. Of 117 tasks measured against a control group of the same brand's untouched prompts, 29% moved visibility up, 26% down and 44% showed no clear effect (3RD, State of AI visibility Q4 2026). That is why 3RD finds the driver behind a gap before it drafts anything, and keeps estimated impact apart from measured change.

Magnus Windeløv

More content is the easy answer. Nearly half the tasks we measure against a control show no clear effect, so we'd rather find the reason first and make fewer things that move the number.

Head of Marketing, 3RD

From 3RD

Why we built it this way

Tracking volume per euro. About €12 per 1,000 answers at entry, against €82.50 on 3RD Starter.

Model coverage at entry. Any of 8 models on the €79 plan. 3RD Starter covers up to 2.

No caps on users, brands or markets. Unlimited on every Nimt plan, including 230 countries and unlimited languages.

Breadth of connections. Nimt says 3,000+ apps. 3RD lists a focused set of named integrations.

Off-page production. The agent drafts press releases, journalist pitches, Reddit posts and LinkedIn content. 3RD gives outreach briefs for your team.

Recurring jobs, Data Studio and MCP write access on every plan.

Be fair

Where Nimt is stronger

The reason, not only the gap. Five drivers scored per market, with a plain-language write-up per topic.

Markets handled one by one. Each country and language pair is its own market, with its own diagnosis.

A plan with a goal, checked daily. Playbooks keep estimated impact apart from measured change, so you see what actually moved.

Predictable cost. Fixed plans with drafting included, a public Enterprise floor and a 7-day free trial with no card.

Signals Nimt says it does not have yet: AI crawler logs from Vercel and Cloudflare, and a demand score for each prompt.

Data access below Enterprise. Export API from Pro; Nimt's API is Enterprise only.

Built for agency partners. Partner pricing per client brand, and Pitch mode and Assessments to show a prospect where they stand.

Where we win

Where 3RD is stronger

Proof

One marketer, zero to the top five in a quarter

Boë Beauté started at 0.0% AI visibility. One in-house marketer with no GEO or SEO specialist background followed the plan, and within a quarter the brand reached 22.2% visibility and the top five of seven competitors. [Read the case →](/case-boe-beaute)